Category Archives: Guns. Yee-Haw

Dayton and El Paso. A Tale of Two Cities

Being a pediatrician is pretty great. For much of the day, I’m playing and interacting with healthy children, monitoring their development, showing off magic tricks, hi-fiving for good report cards, hi-fiving parents for potty training successes.

But I have bad days too.

I’ve cared for children that died from Cancer.

I’ve cared for children that died from SIDS.

Just last month I lost one of my patients in a car accident.

These deaths are tragic and completely heart breaking.

And for everyone of these deaths we search exhaustingly, asking what could we have done differently to prevent this. Asking, what more can we do.

So we act. And we pour every amount of science, medicine, and technology into saving children from cancer.

We passed LAWS to keep infants and toddlers safe and secured in a highly regulated carseat, and young children buckled up.

We regulate the safety of cribs, mattresses, sleepers and post billboards stating unequivocally this is the safest way to sleep and prevent SIDS. Just last month, they took the rock-n-play sleeper off shelves because they said this piece of elevated bedding is too dangerous.

In each of these tragedies our society devotes every effort, including laws, science, and research towards preventing these deaths. Those deaths from the rock-n-play sleeper, although very rare, were unacceptable. Just one extra death from that device was one too many. One too many to ignore even the smallest possibility of a life saved.

But when children die from bullets, whether accidental deaths, homicide, or suicide, are our actions the same?

Do we act with the same ferocious resolve that one death is too many, that one life saved is worth any effort?

The answer is no.

91% of the children killed by a bullet in the world, are in the united states.

That’s 7 kids dying each day from a bullet, 1300 children a year.

And make no mistake, this is an Indiana problem. Hoosier children are in danger. Indiana has the 7th highest per capita rate of shootings involving children in the US.  

Our older children are especially in danger. According to Indiana Youth Institute’s 2015 Kids Count in Indiana Data, 1 out of 5 Hoosier students contemplated suicide in the past 12 months, and about 1 out of 10 teens attempted it. In fact, Indiana has the highest rate of teens who consider suicide and the second highest rate of teens that attempt suicide. Folks this is why we have red flag laws, and our Senators from Indiana know this!

Listen With > 300,000,000 firearms estimated to be in circulation in the united states, efforts to eliminate guns seem misguided. Rather, we as a health care practitioners believe we can shift the paradigm from efforts to live in a world without guns to ensuring we can live safely in a world with guns.

And we can. Imagine a deadly virus was spreading, killing and more and more children every year. We would declare a state of emergency, band together and focus every effort, every dollar, working continuously to stop its spread.  

Folks Gun violence is a disease, and Our Senators must realize that until we start treating it like a disease and focus every ounce on prevention, from background checks to red flag laws, we will never approach a cure.

El Paso and Dayton. A Tale of Two Cities. Killers with different motivations, from different political spectrums. But of course there are similarities, that is the legal access to a weapon that no one would use to protect their family or hunt. A weapon that is only used by evil people for evil purposes. And of course, the same wasted loss of life.

Gun Safety? Get real.

8/8/2013: My IndyStar published response to the awful news from Anderson, Indiana:

I can’t write an article every time a child is needlessly killed by a gun. If I did, I would probably have to quit my job due to the time commitment involved. Just in the last six weeks, in central Indiana, three kids have been accidentally killed. The latest fatality, however, emphasizes a point that we just can’t seem to grasp: THERE IS NO 100% SAFE WAY TO STORE A GUN.

The guns were hidden (in a closet).

The guns were locked away.

The bullets were separate from the gun.

The gun was unloaded….almost.

One bullet, unknowingly and accidentally left in the chamber, is what stands between a 13 year old honor student from going back to school today, shot yesterday by his 10 year old brother.

But we still don’t get it.

The Anderson Police department has called the case ‘a perfect storm of unlikely scenarios,’ musing that “had (the bullet) been in another chamber, it would have dry fired. The odds are just really unbelievable.” They are pleading with area residents to please keep your guns safe, even offering free gun locks.

Unbelievable odds? Nope. They are possibilities. Possibilities of your child getting killed. What a stupid game to play.

I am sick for this family. They have been given the delusion by gun advocates, and even the Anderson police department, that there is a safe way to store guns around children. There isn’t. Are there safer ways to store guns? Who cares?

Once again…

1) A gun kept in the home is 43 times more likely to kill someone known to the family than to kill someone in self defense.

2) A gun kept in the home triples the risk of homicide

3) The risk of suicide is 5 times more likely if a gun is kept in the home

Please stop kidding yourself, and each other, that there is a safe way to keep a gun in a home with children.

Enough anecdotes. The truth about kids and guns

Media loves social experiments.  It’s the driving theme for a lot of shows, from “Let’s Make a Deal,” to the thought provoking, “What Would You Do?”

Tonight (Friday, 1/31/14) on ABC’s 20/20, hosted by Diane Sawyer, an experiment is conducted in which young children are exposed to “gun safety” programs, then observed via hidden camera to see how they would react to discovering a real gun. Their goal is to dramatically reveal the often unrealistic parental expectations of their child around guns.

Here is the preview: http://abcnews.go.com/US/video/young-guns-diane-sawyer-special-21694484

I always try my best to take the findings from a television show with a heavy grain of salt. After all drama, and often sensationalism, is usually the name of the game. This program, however, is actually a replica of a study published in the respected medical journal Pediatrics back in 2001.

The background was a survey of 400 parents, who were asked if their child (age 4-12) could determine the difference between a toy and real gun, and how they would then behave with the guns. Three-fourths (74%) believed their child could tell the difference between a real gun and a toy. 74% also believed they would leave the gun alone, or tell an adult.

The experiment consisted of watching 2-3 children play for 15 minutes in a room where a real, unloaded gun was placed in one drawer, and toy guns in another (they were not told to look into the drawers). 75% of the kids found the real gun. Of these, 80% handled the gun, and 50% pulled the trigger. 90% of the kids who handled the gun, and 95% that had pulled the trigger, later revealed that they had received some sort of gun-safety training. It didn’t matter whether the child was from a gun-owning family, or whether the child had remarked earlier that he or she was ‘interested’ in guns.

Absolutely, I think it reasonable to consider the results from tonight as “made for TV;” however the results from this study are not. Please remember  to teach your child: STOP! Don’t touch. Leave the area. Tell an adult.

IndyPedsDoc

@IndyPedsDoc

When it comes to guns and kids, leave your politics at the door

Perusing social media, I strayed upon this blog article posted by a friend, summarizing “something bad could always happen.” Here, a mom left her 12 year old in the car while running in to a bank. Tragically, the mother was then killed by a bank robber, while the 12 year old was unharmed. This, of course, was on the heels of recent arrests for parents that unknowingly left their children in their cars. Her point? Voicing out against laws* that infringe on our autonomy (maximum freedom, minimum government), she argues:

“There is risk in everything in life. Punishing parents who make rational decisions just because something bad couldhappen is not going to change that. Something bad could always happen.”

This popular argument always seems to come up when defending guns in the home with children.

A couple of examples:

pic1 blog

And here (in response to same article):

blog pic2

So we’re missing the point.

‘Que sera, sera’ is certainly a fun Instagram #yolo, but it makes for really lousy parenting. Yep, something bad could always happen, and accidents do happen. We accept this, and do our best to weight and minimize these risks wherever possible. Bike helmets, seatbelts, fences around pools, etc. This is ok. This is parenting. Guns are no exception. Leaving you kid in the car unattended is no exception.

Instead, some seem to suggest it’s fine to ignore risk, because ‘something bad could always happen.’ In reality, though, I think they are ignoring risk because it gets in the way of their politics. This is really selfish, and it’s jeopardizing the safety of children. And for what? The right for an adult to keep a gun in the house with children? An opportunity to decry a state law infringing personal autonomy? When it comes to protecting the lives and safety of children, we need to keep our politics to ourselves. It’s distorting our perception of risk, which isn’t fair to our kids.

 

*This particular case, by the way, I’m pretty sure isn’t illegal. Most laws, in the states that do have laws, pertain to children under 7, and usually only under certain dangerous situations. See here for your state’s law. http://www.kidsandcars.org/state-laws.html